• the future

    From Utopian Galt@VERT to All on Thu Nov 13 15:00:48 2025
    I think with the stupid rules about banning vpns, digital ids and other garbage. Maybe bbsing might have a return as a tool for us to communicate in the future.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Utopian Galt on Thu Nov 13 16:00:56 2025
    Re: the future
    By: Utopian Galt to All on Thu Nov 13 2025 03:00 pm

    I think with the stupid rules about banning vpns, digital ids and other garbage. Maybe bbsing might have a return as a tool for us to communicate in the future.

    I just did a Google search and I see an article from today saying lawmakers in some US states want to ban VPNs. I doubt that would succeed, since VPNs have legitimate use cases - A common one is that companies often use VPNs to allow people at several of their sites to basically be on the same network. There is stand-alone VPN software, but Windows itself also has built-in support for VPNs. People also use VPNs for privacy, which I think is a legitimate use case; also, some people like to use VPNs to get content from streaming services that's normally only available in other countries.

    I've heard some governments like China have banned VPNs, but they do it for reasons that I don't think is something the US would do.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Utopian Galt@VERT to Nightfox on Thu Nov 13 17:36:47 2025
    Re: the future
    By: Nightfox to Utopian Galt on Thu Nov 13 2025 04:00 pm

    I've heard some governments like China have banned VPNs, but they do

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From phigan@VERT/TACOPRON to Nightfox on Fri Nov 14 04:00:03 2025
    Re: the future
    By: Nightfox to Utopian Galt on Thu Nov 13 2025 04:00 pm

    legitimate use cases - A common one is that companies often use VPNs to allo people at several of their sites to basically be on the same network. There stand-alone VPN software, but Windows itself also has built-in support for VPNs. People also use VPNs for privacy, which I think is a legitimate use

    More than likely they are talking about banning public VPN services sold by companies vs VPN functionality that you would use with your own networks and software like you're describing here. While they're both technically utilizing virtual private networking, they are practically/effectively doing different things. VPN services allow you to bypass network rules and restrictions, while personally set up VPNs allow you to actually access private networks like the name implies.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ TIRED of waiting 2 hours for a taco? GO TO TACOPRONTO.bbs.io